This blog by Barmazid features articles on the history of the Pashtun people as well as images of historical importance related to Pakhtunkhwa and its people
There is a common but incorrect notion among Indians and Pakistani-Punjabis that Maharaja Ranjit Singh ruled Khyber Pass (extending from Jamrud to Torkham) as well as Jalalabad city (in the Nangarhar province of Afghanistan) and the Kabul city. Ranjit Singh and his successors neither ruled Khyber Pass nor the cities of Jalalabad and Kabul.
The westernmost outpost of Sikhs under Ranjit Singh was Jamrud fort, located in the Khyber district of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. Since Jamrud fort is located in the Khyber district, Indians (as well as some Pakistanis) often mistakenly assume that it is located in 'Khyber Pass'. Khyber district is not to be confused with Khyber Pass. Jamrud fort is located in the plain area near the border with Peshawar district. The entire Khyber Pass was part of the Barakzai Kingdom of Kabul in 1830s and the Ali Masjid fort (located in the middle of Khyber Pass) was garrisoned by Afghan troops of Amir Dost Muhammad Khan.
Location of Jamrud fort in the plain area near Khyber Pass
Ranjit Singh did not build any dam in the Khyber Pass
Yesterday a Pakistani-Punjabi nationalist account posted an article in the comments section of my page, written by someone named
Rahsid Yousafzai
in which the latter showers high praises on Ranjit Singh. Ahmad Rashid Yousafzai writes that Ranjit Singh was a modern and broad-minded ruler and had scientific mind. He is of opinion that Ranjit Singh was thousand times more progressive and sharp-minded person than any Pashtun and Mughal rulers of India.
رنجیت سنگھ کا مقرر کردہ درہ خیبر کا حاکم برطانوی مہم جو کرنل لیزلی ،(جس کا ہیڈکوارٹر علی مسجد تھا)، ہی وہ شخص تھا جس نے جمرود تک پانی سپلائی کا منصوبہ بنایا اور اسے عمل میں لا کر اس حوالے سے ایک نئے دور کا آغاز کیا۰ یہ سباق فاٹا میں پہلا ڈیم تھا۰ (کرنل لیزلی بعد ازاں مسلمان ہوگیا تھا اور فدا محمد خان نام اختیار کیا
Translation: "Ranjit Singh appointed a British adventurer Colonel Leslie as his governor of Khyber Pass, and Ali Masjid was headquarter [of Colonel Leslie]. The latter initiated a project of supplying water to the areas up to Jamrud. This was first ever dam in the former FATA. He later converted to Islam and adopted the name of Fida Muhammad Khan."
Rashid Yousafzai has butchered and botched history here and is viewing the word 'dam' from modern lens. Leslie was in the service of Amir Dost Muhammad Khan, not Ranjit. He did not construct a 'Tarbela Dam' or a welfare project of any sort in Khyber Pass. In summers Sikh soldiers stationed in the Jamrud fort were dependent on a seasonal stream issuing out of Khyber Pass. Leslie, commanding "Cabool troops", would block that stream and Sikhs had to give bribes to him to resume the flow. This is reported by Captain John Wood ("Journey to the source of the River Oxus", p-100), Alexander Burnes ("Cabool", p-127) and Mohan Lal (Journey in the Punjab, Afghanistan...., p-457).
Portrait of Ranjit SinghPortrait of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Louvre Collection
Gor Khuttree is an important monument in the old city of Peshawar. It can be either appraoched from Chowk Yadgar or from Hastnagari Gate. In ancient times it was a Buddhist establishment which later assumed a Hindu character. The earliest account of the site is given by Babur. Both Akbar and Jahangir regard it as a place of jogis (Hindu saints who believe in quiet meditiation). It had become a place of Hindu pilgrimage and its fame had reached far and wide. In the year 1640 AD Jahan Ara Begum, daughter of Mughal emperor Shah Jahan, converted the site into Serai Jahanabad and built also a Jami Masjid and a Hammam. During the days of Sikhs the mosque was destroyed, and a temple of Gorakhnath was built on its site.
Gor Kattri, Peshawar city, 1910 (c). Photo by R.B.Holmes.
Lord Curzon arrival at Gor Khatri, Peshawar, to receive the address from Municipality of Peshawar city, 1902. Photo by W.D.Holmes.
Hindu ascentics at Gor Khatri in Peshawar, 16th century. A folio from an Illustrated manuscript of Baburnama, ca.1592.
The Pashtun squad of Major George Broadfoot at Mudki (Ferozpur district, Punjab, India), 1845. Painting by Waldemar von Hohenzollern. Source
The Battle of Mudki was fought on 18 December 1845, between the forces of the East India Company and the Sikh Khalsa Army of the Sikh kingdom of the Punjab during First Anglo-Sikh War.
Parvez Mahmood (a writer for Friday Times) believes that Adina Beg Arain (a Punjabi Muslim who was contemporary of Ahmad Shah Abdali) never collaborated with Afghans of Punjab because they were inherently deceitful and because they were plunderers.
Adina Beg did collaborate with Indo-Afghans of Punjab once he became the governor of Punjab. According to Ibrat-nama of Ali-ud-Din (written in 1850), Adina Beg persuaded the Afghans of Kasur, Daulpur, Jalandhar and Alwalpur to join him in eradicating Sikh marauders in 1758. 1
Pervez Mehmood is simply repeating Sikh and Indian narrative in his article. There is not a single primary account which suggests that Adina Beg was hostile to Afghans and Indo-Afghans because of their supposed deceitful nature or because they plundered Punjab.
Indo-Afghans of Punjab were the most potent force against Sikh marauders in 18th century. They had long history of assisting their Mughal overlords in rooting out the Sikh marauders, protecting the lives of Muslims of Punjab and restoring peace to Punjab.
Indo-Afghans of Punjab were not forces of disruption so Adina Beg could not collaborate with them for his schemes of disrupting peace of Punjab (to undermine Mughal and Afghan authority). For disrupting law and order of Punjab, he used Sikhs. Once Adina became governor of Punjab, he no longer had any need for disruptive and marauding forces like Sikhs and called upon the Indo-Afghans of Punjab as well as other Muslim and Hindu zamindars of Punjab to restore peace.
Deceit and plunder did not bother Adina Beg. He himself employed deceit on number of occasions and collaborated with jathas of Sikhs, who were the greatest plunderers of all. He also summoned Marathas to Punjab and gave them and Sikhs a free hand to plunder Sirhind. 2
Adina Beg refused the summon from the court of Timur Khan Durrani's court at Lahore because (1) earlier he had agreed to govern Jalandhar Doab on behalf of Afghans on the condition that he would not be required to attend the court (2) because he was up to no good and feared that Jahan Khan (the regent of Prince Timur) had figured him out. Adina Beg had ambition to become governor of Punjab himself so he undermined Afghan rule of Punjab simply for that reason, just like previously he had undermined Mughal rule over Punjab. It had nothing to do with the supposed deceitful nature of Afghans.
Sikhs owed their rise in 18th century to Adina Beg Arain, a Punjabi Muslim noble in the service of Mughals. The latter was a saboteur and believed in "chaos is a ladder''. He used Sikh marauders to destroy the law and order of Punjab to pave the way for his rise to power. The cost of his dangerous games was the suffering of his own Punjabi Muslims at the hands of Sikh Khalsa who in those years were extremely anti-Muslim. Mughals even in late 1740s and early 1750 had the means and power to easily exterminated the menace of Sikh marauders but Adina Beg backstabbed his Mughal masters and made sure that Sikh marauders were not eliminated. When Adina Beg finally became the governor of Punjab for Maratha empire, he decided to get rid of the Sikh marauders, but he suddenly died due to a disease and could not finish the monster he had nurtured.
Nurturing of Sikh marauders by Adina Beg
Sometime after the invasion of Nadir Shah Afsar, Zakariya Khan (the Mughal governor of Lahore subah) appointed Adina Beg as Nazim (governor) of Jalandhar Doab and ordered him to crush the Sikh marauders there who were not powerful at that time. Adina Beg did the opposite, he nurtured the Sikh marauders. James Browne, writing in 1787, says : "The force he (Adina Beg) had him was fully equal to the execution of that service, but Adina Beg, considering that if he should entirely put an end to all disturbances in that district, there would remain no necessity for continuing him in so extensive a command, carried on intrigues with the chiefs of the Sicks (Sikhs), and secretly encouraged them to continue their depredations, at the same time pretending to be very desirous of subduing them. From this management the Sicks became daily more powerful and seized upon several places in distant parts of the subah of Lahore". This short-sighted silliness had repercussions for him. Due to the devastation and lootings by Sikhs (facilitated by Adina beg himself) in Jalandhar Doab, Adina Beg could not realize revenue from the people. He failed in paying his revenue to the Lahore government. He was dismissed from the governorship of Jalandhar Doab and was thrown into prison. After an year of imprisonment, Zakariya Khan released him with a warning and appointed him deputy governor of Jalandhar Doab under Shahnawaz Khan (son of Zakariya Khan).
Adina Beg had plans to bring ruin upon Mughals. In 1747 he encouraged his master Shahnawaz Khan (then governor of Lahore subah) to open communications with Ahmad Shah Abdali, while at the same time he informed the Delhi Wazir that Shahnawaz was turning rebel against the authority of the Mughal emperor and that he had invited help of Ahmad Shah Abdali. The author of Siyar-ul-Mutakherin (written in 1780) writes: "the advisor of the young viceroy (Shahnawaz Khan) was Adina Beg Khan, who was a devil under the appearance of a man. He was resolved to overset his master's power and to raise his own on its ruins.
In 1748 Mir Mannu (the new Mughal governor of Lahore subah) appointed Adina Beg as faujdar of Jalandhar Doab. Mir Mannu ordered Adina Beg to eliminate the Sikh marauders, but the latter undermined the authority of Mughals and "began as formerly to intrigue with the Sicks and took no effectual means to suppress them" (James Browne, 1787 AD). Kaura Mal (a Nanakshahi Sikh in the service of Mughals) advised Mir Mannu that he should reconcile with Sikh marauders. He said: "The Sikhs always cause confusion and disorder. It will be advisable, if you settle something for these people. They will not create disturbances, and I will be responsible for it" (Tarikh-i Ahwal-i Sikhan of Khushwaqt Rai, Witten in 1811 AD). Adina Beg who wanted disorder in Punjab and troubles for Mughals at the hands of Sikhs, disagreed with the advice of Kaur Mal and said to Mir Mannu: "Goodness to evil doers is doing evil to good people". However, Mir Mannu heeded the advice of Kaura Mal and granted Sikhs one-fourth revenue of Patti. In December 1751 Ahmad Shah Abdali entered Punjab and laid siege to Lahore. After four months, Mir Mannu called a council of war and asked them to come up with best plan of action against the besiegers. Kaura Mal pointed out that Mir Mannu's troops were no match in open for the hardy Afghans, and that Abdali's camp was also short of provisions, and that shortly afterwards hot Indian summer would set in, which will be unbearable for Abdali's troops, and he would either return or attack them at disadvantage. This was a wise plan but Adina Beg was up to no good and he recommended immediate action against the besiegers. Mir Mannu agreed with Adina Beg, issued from the city and attacked Abdali's camp. According to Farhat-un-Nazirin (written in 1770 AD), Adina Beg instructed one of his men to shoot Kaura Mal from behind. When Kaura Mal was shot dead by his man, Adina Beg (who commanded the entire left wing of the army) treacherously deserted his post and fled to Lahore city along with his entire contingent, heavily contributing to the defeat of Mir Mannu. The latter surrendered to Ahmad Shah Abdali who installed him in the governorship of Lahore on his behalf.
After some time, Mir Mannu dispatched Adina Beg against Sikhs who were ravaging Jalandhar Doab again. Adina Beg was viewed with some suspicion because of his treacherous conduct in the latest battle with Ahmad Shah Abdali. So, to dispel the suspicions, he used to send 40 or 50 Sikh captives from Jalandhar Doab to Mir Mannu from time to time. John Malcolm in 1810 writes: "That able but artful chief (Adina Beg) considered this turbulent tribe (Sikhs) in no other light than as the means of his personal advancement. He was careful not to reduce them altogether, but, after defeating them in an action which was fought near Makhowal, he entered into a secret understanding with them, by which though their excursions were limited, they enjoyed security to which they had been unaccustomed, and from which they gathered strength and resources for future efforts.
In 1757 Afghans began to directly rule Punjab and restored peace and order for few months. Jahan Khan (the regent of Timur Shah Durrani) made the mistake of appointing Adina Beg as faujdar of Jalandhar Doab, conceding to him the privilege that he would not be required to attend the court at Lahore. Adina Beg began to undermine the Afghan government through Sikhs just like he had undermined the previous Mughal government. When the disturbances caused by Sikh marauders increased, Jahan Khan summoned Adina Beg to devise means for subduing Sikhs. But Adina Beg flatly refused to come. He had also defaulted in paying the tribute of Jalandhar Doab. Jahan Khan realized that Adina Beg was mal-intentioned, so he sent a detachment to seize him. Adina Beg had no choice but to openly join his Sikh allies and resist Afghans. He and his Sikh allies succeeded in driving out Saadat Khan Afridi from Jalandhar city and plundered all the Jalandhar Doab. Panth Prakash by Rattan Singh (written in 1840) is very unauthentic and poor source of history. But if Sikh traditions in that source are to be believed, then Adina Beg was complicit in the genocide of the Punjabi Muslims of the Jalandhar city. According to Panth Prakash, Adina Beg made a deal with Sikhs according to which Sikhs got the license from him to massacre the Muslims of Jalandhar city, and in return he would get their military help against the Afghans. Adina Beg took an oath on Quran in front of Sikhs for assurance. According to Panth Prakash of Rattan Singh and that of Gyan Singh, Sikhs spared Hindus but massacred all the Muslims of Jalandhar city (except young Muslim women who were forcibly converted to Sikhism). They put to sword even Muslim infants and children. They defiled the mosques in the city with pig's blood.
Adina Beg realized that he cannot entirely depend on Sikhs to oust Afghans from Punjab, so he invited Marathas to invade and annex Punjab, promising them to pay them one lakh of rupees for every day of marching and Rs.50,000 for each day of halt. In March 1758 the combined forces of Marathas and Adina Beg (which largely comprised of Sikhs) totalled two lakh fighters and they easily captured the Sirhind city. The author of Tarikh-i-Alamgir-Sani (written in c1759) writes: "As the Marathas and the Sikhs thought of nothing but plunder, they so thoroughly looted the inhabitant of Sirhind, high and low, that none, either male or female, had a cloth on his or her person. They pulled down the houses and carried off the timber. They dug up floors for buried treasures and seized everything they could lay their hands on".
Marathas occupied Punjab and expelled Afghans. They entrusted Adina beg with the governorship of the Punjab on promising on annual tribute of 75 lakh rupees. Adina Beg had to collect 75 lakh of rupees, which he had to pay to the Marathas; and this huge sum could not be collected if Sikh marauders were allowed to loot peasants and merchants. Sikhs had not ceased their marauding activities. They were no longer of any use to Adina Beg who now had the backing of vast empire of the Marathas. As governor of entire Punjab, Adina Beg called upon the leading Muslim and Hindu zamindars and chiefs in every part of the province in eradicating Sikh marauders. Ahmad Shah of Batala in his Tarikh-i-Hind (written in 1830) writes: "Adina Beg ordered that in no district or parganah should Sikhs be allowed to live, they should either be killed or captured. Mirza Aziz Bakhsh was one of his most trust nobles. Adina Beg appointed him to this duty at the head of several thousand horse. He also entrusted him with one thousand carpenters with steel hatchets and axes for the purpose of cutting down and clearing away the jungles and forests where Sikhs used to seek shelter, so that no hiding place might exist for the people of this exist. "
Sikh marauders had grown exponentially in the last 17 years, thanks to the Adina Beg. Consequently, he launched extensive operations against the Sikhs, employing unconventional strategies. This resulted in severe famine in Punjab in July-August 1758. Adina Beg attempted to eliminate the Sikhs by starvation, deliberately cutting off food supplies to the Majha region. Ali-ud-Din Si, in his Ibrat-namah (written in 1850), states: 'In the Majha region, wheat was scarce, even at two seers per rupee. Adina Beg Khan blocked grain imports from Malwa to starve the Sikhs, further escalating prices. This measure severely impacted the poor, forcing them to migrate. Ironically, despite this, the Sikhs continued to grow in strength.".
On 15th September 1758, Adina Beg died anticlimactically after succumbing to an attack of colic. He governed Punjab only for five months which were consumed in his attempt of eradicating Sikh marauders.
Did Adina Beg have hatred for Afghans and Indo-Afghans? Response to Pervez Mehmood
Parvez Mahmood, a Punjabi-Muslim writer for Friday Times, asserts that Adina Beg never collaborated with Afghans of Punjab because they were inherently deceitful and because they were plunderers 1. But Adina Beg did collaborate with Indo-Afghans of Punjab once he became the governor of Punjab. According to Ibrat-nama of Ali-ud-Din (written in 1850), Adina Beg persuaded the Afghans of Kasur, Daulpur, Jalandhar and Alwalpur to join him in eradicating Sikh marauders in 1758. 2
There is not a single primary account which suggests that Adina Beg was hostile to Afghans and Indo-Afghans because of their supposed deceitful nature or because they plundered Punjab. Indo-Afghans of Punjab were not forces of disruption so Adina Beg could not collaborate with them for his schemes of disrupting peace of Punjab (to undermine Mughal and Afghan authority). For disrupting law and order of Punjab, he used Sikhs. Once Adina became governor of Punjab, he no longer had any need for disruptive and marauding forces like Sikhs and called upon the Indo-Afghans of Punjab as well as other Muslim and Hindu zamindars of Punjab to restore peace. Deceit and plunder did not bother Adina Beg. He himself employed deceit on number of occasions and collaborated with jathas of Sikhs, who were the greatest plunderers of all. He also summoned Marathas to Punjab and gave them and Sikhs a free hand to plunder Sirhind. 3
Adina Beg refused the summon from the court of Timur Khan Durrani's court at Lahore because (1) earlier he had agreed to govern Jalandhar Doab on behalf of Afghans on the condition that he would not be required to attend the court (2) because he was up to no good and feared that Jahan Khan (the regent of Prince Timur) had figured him out. Adina Beg had ambition to become governor of Punjab himself so he undermined Afghan rule of Punjab simply for that reason, just like previously he had undermined Mughal rule over Punjab. It had nothing to do with the supposed deceitful nature of Afghans.
The chieftains of Punjab (some of whom were Indo-Afghans), who called to his banners when he became governor of Punjab for Maratha empire in 1758, were the same elites who had previously served the Mughal empire and had also responded to the calls of Mir Mannu and other Mughal governors of Punjab when they were summoned for wars against Sikh marauders. Adina Beg was only able to gain their support when he became governor of Punjab. Before that, he chiefly relied on Sikhs and his own contingent. None of those Punjabi-Muslim nobles opposed Durrani governor of Punjab when the latter was fighting against Adina Beg and his Sikh allies.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that Adina Beg harbored a grand vision of establishing Punjabi Muslim supremacy in Punjab during his conflicts with the Afghans or his decision to exterminate Sikhs. His actions appear to have been primarily self-serving. He acted against the Sikhs only because they were disrupting the peace and economy of Punjab. As governor, he was duty-bound to restore law and order, ensuring the collection of the 7.5 million rupee tribute for his Maratha overlords.
A desi sepoy of British-Indian army bringing in a captured Mohmand Pashtun freedom fighter, 1897. From London Illustrated News. Source
John Charlton, actually never visited North West Frontier, or any part of India for that matter, and did not witness any of the battles of 1897. He created vivid, imaginative illustrations, using descriptions, reports, or second-hand visual materials, for publication in The Graphic. His works drew inspiration from news dispatches and accounts rather than firsthand sketches. The lack of the background in this scene is indicative of it being an imagantive artwork.
According to the original caption, the sawar belongs to 13th Bengal lancers which in 1897 was 38% Sikhs, 25% Punjabi Muslim, 25% Dogra and 12% Pathan. It was commanded by Sher Singh (a Sikh) in 1897.
Ruins of Saragarhi post in Samana range (Hangu district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa), 1897.
On 12 September 1897, a lashkar of Afridi and Orakzai freedom fighters bravely climbed the ascent of Samana range despite of being fired upon from the top of the hill. They reached the hill-top, stormed the Saragarhi outpost and easily massacred the 21 Sikh soldiers in the service of British imperialists (Pashtuns would not give quarters to Sikh soldiers and would not take them prisoners so the claim that Sikh soldiers refused to surrender, is nonsense ; Sikh soldiers simply had no choice but to fight to the death). Fort Gulistan and Fort Lockhart were only 1.5 miles away from the Saragarhi outpost but the 500 British soldiers garrisoned in those two forts, either could not gather courage or did not deem it ncessary to put their own precious lives to come to the rescue of the mere 21 disposible Desi sepoys, and watched the storming of Saragarhi by from safe distance.
This even is regarded by the Sikhs as most momentous chapter of their history and they commemorate this event as Saragarhi day (12th September) which is a holiday in the Indian state of Punjab.
The image of Ahmad Shah Durrani has been largely shaped and dominated by 20th-century Indian writings. Indian authors portrayed the Sikh misls as dauntless heroes and Ahmad Shah Abdali as a hideous villain. One historical event that they have distorted is a battle referred to as the "Vadda Ghallughara" by the Sikhs. The Indian editors of Wikipedia describe it as follows: "Vadda Ghalughara was the mass murder of unarmed Sikhs by the Afghan forces of the Durrani Empire."
Upon examining the original 18th-century sources, I found that the Sikh portrayal of the Vadda Ghallughara, repeated by their Indian countrymen, is nothing more than a falsification of the facts. What is claimed to have been a massacre or genocide of unarmed innocents was, in reality, a battle between two armies on a battlefield. The so-called "foreign invasion," as described by Indian and Sikh historians, was in fact a military expedition by Ahmad Shah Durrani to one of the provinces of his empire in 1762, undertaken to restore law and order disrupted by Sikh marauders.
The war of Panipat (1759–1761) and the growth of Sikh marauders
In March–April 1758, the Marathas expelled the Afghans from Punjab and appointed Adina Beg Khan—who had invited them against the Afghans—as their governor. The Khalsa Sikhs, as a result of their conflict with the Mughals, had turned into roving bands of marauders surviving on looting and pillaging. Adina Beg, commonly viewed as a Mughal but in fact a Punjabi Muslim from the Arain caste, developed relations with the Sikhs and allowed them to grow and prosper in the Jalandhar Doab, a territory assigned to him by his Mughal overlords. His aim was to undermine and erode Mughal authority in the region through the anarchy caused by the Sikh marauders.
Although raised in a Mughal household and in service to the Mughals, Adina Beg secretly worked against them. His schemes were disrupted when a much more powerful force—the Afghans under Ahmad Shah Durrani—took over Punjab. Adina Beg continued to support the Sikh marauders to weaken Afghan rule. However, realizing that he and his Sikh allies were insufficient to dislodge the Afghans, he invited the Marathas to invade Punjab. The Marathas appointed him governor of Punjab. Having no further use for the Sikh marauders, he then resolved to exterminate them. The seventy-five lakh rupees he was required to collect from Punjab for his Maratha overlords could not be realized while the Sikh marauders, disruptors of peace and economy, remained active.
He therefore launched a massive operation against the Khalsa Sikhs, but within a few months he died of dysentery, and the Khalsa Sikhs remained active. In October 1759, Ahmad Shah Durrani re-took Punjab from the Marathas and engaged in war with them for the next fifteen months. The absence of both Afghans and Marathas from Punjab during this period gave the Sikhs a great opportunity to recover from their losses and gain further strength. Since Sikhs were strongly associated with loot and plunder, a large number of highway robbers, thieves, and other criminal elements of Punjab joined their ranks and adopted Sikhism merely for the sake of plunder. Thus, their numbers grew exponentially.
When Ahmad Shah Durrani won the Battle of Panipat and returned to Punjab, the Sikhs hid in the Shiwalik hills and the Malwa desert. Once Durrani returned to Afghanistan, the Sikhs emerged from their hiding places and resumed bloodshed and plunder in Punjab.
Sikh marauders besiege Jindiala
In January 1762, about eighty thousand Sikh warriors besieged the fortified town of Jandiala, located twelve miles east of Amritsar. The majority of the town’s population was Muslim, and cow meat was consumed by the townspeople—something that greatly infuriated the Sikhs. The chief of the fortified town was Guru Aqil Das, who belonged to the Niranjani sect. Since this sect advocated peace and friendship with Muslims, and permitted the slaughter of cows for food in Jindiala, the town incurred the wrath and enmity of the Khalsa Sikhs. Guru Aqil Das had pledged allegiance to Ahmad Shah Durrani, and the Khalsa Sikhs regarded him as an enemy for these various reasons. According to the author of Tarikh-i-Husain Shahi, the number of Sikhs besieging Jandiala was around 80,000.
Ahmad Shah Durrani responds to Sikh disturbances
Ahmad Shah Durrani set out from Afghanistan after receiving news of the disturbances created by the Sikhs and the defeat of some of his officers at their hands in Punjab. Upon entering Punjab, he learned about the situation in Jandiala. Since the Muslim inhabitants were likely to be burnt alive by the Sikhs as punishment for cow slaughter if the town fell, Ahmad Shah Durrani hastened his march toward Jandiala. When the Sikhs received word of his arrival near Lahore, they lifted the siege of Jandiala and fled. By the time Ahmad Shah Durrani reached the town, the Sikhs had already abandoned it. From Jandiala, he dispatched his spies to gather intelligence about the destination and movements of the large Sikh force. He remained in Jandiala for three days.
Meanwhile, the fleeing Sikh marauders reached the vicinity of Malerkotla and began pillaging the surrounding villages. The author of Tahmas-nama, who was present in Sirhind at the time, records that the number of Sikhs and their supporters had swelled to 150,000 cavalry and infantry. When Zain Khan Mohmand, the governor of Sirhind, was informed that the Sikhs were engaged in plunder and bloodshed near Malerkotla, he set out from Sirhind with ten to fifteen thousand cavalry and infantry to confront them. Bhikhan Khan, the Nawab of Malerkotla (a Pashtun descendant), also joined Zain Khan. They encamped at Malerkotla, while the Sikhs established their camp at a distance of seven kos from them.
The Battle of Green Leaves (1762): Ahmad Shah Durrani vs Sikh Forces
Ahmad Shah Durrani was informed by his spies that the Sikh marauders who had fled from Jandiala had gathered at the village of Kup in Malerkotla, where they had besieged Zain Khan Mohmand, Bhikhan Khan, Murtaza Khan Barech, and other chieftains. The Sikhs had always avoided engaging in a pitched battle with Ahmad Shah Durrani and would turn tail at his approach. The Sikh army near Malerkotla was confident that Ahmad Shah would either return to Afghanistan from Jandiala or, if he advanced toward Sirhind, they would learn of his movements in time and escape, as they had done in the past. But this time, Ahmad Shah was determined not to let them get away. He resolved to launch a surprise attack.
In just 36 hours, he covered a distance of 240 kilometers and crossed two rivers, catching the Sikh army at Malerkotla completely off guard. Before the attack, Ahmad Shah sent messengers to Zain Khan, instructing him to launch an assault on the Sikhs the following morning and keep them engaged until his arrival. Furthermore, Zain Khan’s Punjabi soldiers were ordered to place green leaves or grass on their heads so that Ahmad Shah’s Uzbek soldiers could distinguish them from the Sikhs and avoid killing them by mistake. Because of this, the battle came to be known among Pashtuns as Da Shne Panray Jagra—“the Battle of the Green Leaf.”
Ahmad Shah’s sudden appearance on the battlefield struck fear into the hearts of the Sikhs, who immediately fled. Despite being exhausted from their forced march of 240 kilometers without rest, the Afghans pursued and attacked them relentlessly. The author of Tahmas-nama, an eyewitness to these events, records that the Sikhs were either attempting to escape or reciting the Kalima of Islam and begging for their lives. The Afghans pursued them as far as the fort of Barnala, killing about thirty thousand Sikh warriors. However, as evening fell and darkness spread, the Afghans did not advance beyond Barnala, allowing the majority of the Sikh force to escape with their lives.
"Vadda Ghallughara": Sikh army or civilians?
Sikhs refer to this battle as Vadda Ghallughara, meaning “the Great Massacre.” Modern Sikh writers have begun to claim that the thirty thousand Sikhs killed in this battle were mostly women, children, and unarmed elderly men. This claim, however, is false. None of the 18th- or early 19th-century sources mention the presence of Sikh women or children on the battlefield.
Tahmas Khan, the author of Tahmas-nama—who personally participated in the battle—records only the presence of Sikh cavalry and infantry. His account makes no mention of Sikh women or children.
Similarly, the author of Siyar al-Mutakhireen (written in 1780) describes only Sikh cavalry and infantry taking part in the battle. He writes:
"But as the territory of Lahor was known to be the spot where the Abdalies, first of all, landed in their expeditions towards Hindostan, the Syks thought proper to evacuate it entirely; and repairing to the country of Rohy, a district of very difficult access, they took possession of a very strong fort in it, and assembled there from all parts, to the number of two lacs of men, cavalry and infantry. But this did not deter the Abdali-king. Informed of their retreat, as well as of their But are numbers, he measured ninety cosses of ground in two days, and falling upon those free-booters the moment he was least expected, he drew smoke from their breasts". [Ghulam Hussain Khan, Siyar al-Mutakhireen, English trans. Haji Mutafa, Vol. 4, p. 3]
In 1787, James Browne translated a Persian manuscript written in 1784; that work also refers solely to the presence of a Sikh army on the battlefield. It states:
"The Durrany Shah sent thirty thousand horse under his conduct, who marching seventy crores (one hundred and forty miles) almost without (L) intermission, surprized the army of the Sicks, at a place called Barnala, and put great numbers to the sword55 ; the rest as usual, dispersed for atime; after which, the Shah proceeded to Sirhind." [James Browne, History of the Origin and Progress of the Sikhs, p. 38]
To support their claims, Sikh writers often cite Panth Prakash, a poetic work written in 1841 by the Sikh author Ratan Singh. However, Panth Prakash is filled with fictitious and exaggerated details and is not considered an authentic or reliable source for 18th-century events. Moreover, Panth Prakash itself clearly states that the Sikhs had left their families in Malwa before confronting Ahmad Shah Durrani in 1762. [Sr Guru Panth Prakash, English translation by Kulwant Singh, Vol. 2, p. 483]
The confusion arises from its reference to the Afghan attack on the Sikh baheer (بہیر)—a term meaning baggage-train. In military usage, the baggage-train contained weapons, equipment, provisions, loot, servants, and artisans, not families. Sikh writers have misinterpreted baheer as meaning “families,” which is a distortion of the text. As Panth Prakash itself states, Sikh families were left behind in Malwa.
It is important to remember that Sikh warfare against the Afghans in the 18th century was based on swift, hit-and-run tactics. Their women and children never accompanied them into areas that could turn into battlefields. The speed with which the Sikhs fled from Jandiala to Malerkotla also demonstrates that they were not encumbered by families. Moreover, the Sikhs knew that Afghans would not slaughter women and children but would enslave them, taking them to Afghanistan and Turkistan for sale. For this reason, Sikh families were always left in the Shiwalik Hills or Malwa desert when the warriors went out to fight.
If Sikh women and children had been present on the battlefield near Malerkotla, the Afghans would certainly have enslaved them, and contemporary historians of the 18th century would have recorded it—just as some, such as the author of Siyar al-Mutakhireen, documented the enslavement of Maratha women after the Battle of Panipat.
Vadda Ghallughara imagined by a modern Sikh artist
References
Sikh History from Persian Sources, edited by J.S. Grewal & Irfan Habib
The Siyar-ul-Mutakherin, history of the Mahomedan power in India
Fall of the Mughal Empire, Vol.2 by Jadunath Sarkar
Panth Prakash by Rattan Singh Bhangu
History of the Origin and Progress of the Sikhs by James Browne
Waqiat-i-Durrani (Urdu translation of Tarikh Hussain Shahi)
Muhammad Akram Khan: the third son of the Amir Dost Muhammad Khan Barakzai, 1842.
He commanded the Commanded the Afghan Cavalry at the Battle of Gujrat in the Second Anglo-Sikh War.
Inscription content: MUHUMMUD UKRUM KHAN: Third Son of the UMEER DOST MUHUMMUD KHAN Afghan Commanded the Afghan Cavalry at the Battle of Goojarat when (?) (Dost Muhummud - the present Umeer or Ruler of Caubul) is I believe of the Barakzye family, allied to the Persians C.G.
Inscription note: Printed and handwritten in pencil.
Burj Hari Singh, Peshawar, January 27, 1903. Photo by Gertrude Bell.
Burj Hari Singh (near Islamic college) marks the place where the Sikh general Hari Singh Nalwa fell fighting against Afghans. It was erected by Paolo Avitabile.
Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism, was a contemporary of Bahlul Lodi, Sikandar Lodi and Ibrahim Lodi. It appears that some of the disciples of Guru Nanak were Pashtuns, as corroborated by the following anecdote recorded in "Tazkira-i Pir Hassu Teli" of Surat Singh (completed in 1647 AD). Guru Nanak was born and raised in the times when Punjab was dominated by Pashtuns.
"When he [Guru Nanak] died, leaving this for another abode, Hindus and Muslims gathered around the Baba's head.
The Hindus said that he was a Hindu, and thus he ought to be cremated. The assemblage of Muslims desired to make a grave for him.
Two bodies of his thereupon came to view: One they took and cremated; and the other was put in front for the [Muslim] funeral prayer.
[But] he left both his bodies and went across to the other side of River Ravi. There an Afghan disciple (murid) had the privilege of a sight of him.
He [Nanak] laid out before him a floorcloth containing a variety of eatables. The Afghan ate his fill from that laid-out meal.
The Afghan ate his fill from that laid-out meal. As is the convention of old, he [the Afghan] spoke and cried out about the ordeal of his journey, in soldierly talk that night.
When that traveller crossed over to this side of the river, he saw the grave and the flames of cremation. He asked, "Why are these people making all this noise"?
[Someone] replied: "Nanak has passed away from this world!". "The amazing thing is," [he was told,] "that after his death, there came to be two bodies. One is being buried and the other is being cremated".
[The Afghan] said that both [Muslims and Hindus] have done wrong: "I have seen him well settled on the other side of the river". "I have eaten food and fruits and have talked with him, and I have come to this side after taking leave from him.
All became astonished on hearing this and the report of his [Nanak's] moving himself to another place became well known.
["Sikh history from Persian sources", pp.88-89]
Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism, was a contemporary of Bahlul Lodi, Sikandar Lodi and Ibrahim Lodi. He served as storekeeper of the Daulat Khan Lodi's grain before 1526. The author of Dabistan-i-Mazahib (written in 1655), writes:
"Nanak was a Bedi, and the Bedis are a sub-caste of the Khatris. He acquired repute during the reign of his majesty King Firdaus Makani Zahiruddin Babur. Before the victory of Firdaus Makani over the Afghans, he was a modi (storekeeper) of Daulat Khan Lodi, who was one of the greatest nobles of Ibrahim Khan, the ruler of India. The mystical spirit came over him and acquired power over his heart. Thereupon he went to the shop, and whatever of his own grain and of Daulat Khan he had in the shop or in his house, he gave away, and broke the ties with his wife and children. Daulat Khan was astonished on hearing the news. [But] when he found Nanak to be under mystical influence, he refrained from injuring him". [translated by Irfan Habib].
His gruesome punishments and ruthless ‘justice’ drove half of the population of Peshawar away from the city. Here we look at his career as a Governor of Peshawar.
The end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 left many war veterans without job assignments, and some of those veterans, following the footsteps of their predecessors, decided to go to Constantinople, Persia and India to seek jobs with the armies of the rulers of these countries. Among these mercenaries was Paolo Avitabile of Agerola, a small village between Napoli and Salerno in Naples, Italy. Paolo Avitabile (25 October 1791 – 28 March 1850) served in the Neapolitan militia during the Napoleonic wars. In 1820 he joined the army of the Shah of Persia, attaining the rank of colonel and receiving several decorations for his military services. After a short break in Italy, he went back via Kabul -> Peshawar to Punjab to enlist in Ranjit Singh army in 1827. After some service in the army, he was made administrator of Wazirabad in 1829. In 1837 he succeeded Hari Singh Nalwa as governor of Peshawar and left for Italy in 1843.
Stefano Malatesta in his book titled “The Neopolitan Who Tamed The Afghans” makes a telling metaphor of his cruel rule in Peshawar. He says that the inhabitants of Peshawar found themselves ruled by Tamerlane, Dracula and the Bluebeard put together.
I will not elaborate on Tamerlane as he is well-known in our part of the world (and also in the rest of the world). But just a one tweet each on Dracula and Bluebeard to understand what we are here talking about.
Vlad the Impaler or the Vlad Dracula was the ruler of Wallachia (part of Romania) in 15th c, & is known for his cruelty. In this German woodcut from 15th c he is shown dining in the middle of corpses. He nailed the turbans of Turkish envoys onto their heads.
Vlad the Impaler and the Turkish envoys, painting by Theodor Aman
1499 German woodcut showing Dracule waide dining among the impaled corpses of his victims.
Bluebeard is a 17th century French folktale of a wealthy cruel man who killed many of his wives one after another. https://merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bluebeard… Now imagine the character of Paolo Avitabile whom Malatesta thinks was the mix of all these ruthless people.
Bluebeard, his wife, and the keys in a 19th-century illustration by Gustave Doré
Keep in mind that he was appointed governor of Peshawar in 1837 after the killing of the Hari Singh Nalwa, the best general of the Ranjit Singh's sikh army. Ranjit Singh needed someone who could establish and consolidate his ruler over the Afghans of Peshawar and surroundings.
Left: Hari Singh Nalwa, right: Paolo Avitabile
Avitabile commenced his governorship with hanging 50 people each day that he thought were criminals on the wooden posts that he had installed around the city, & cut out the tongues of liars & storytellers. He would cut tongue of the doctors who would attend to these victims.
Source:The man who would be king by B. Macintyre
“…[He] had more time for chickens than for the native people he terrorized.” “A keen pornographer, Avitabile’s home was decorated in supreme bad taste, the bedroom walls ‘covered with pictures of dancing girls.”
Source:The man who would be king by B. Macintyre
"...for one thousand rupees of revenue collected by the troops, two thousand rupees worth of property is destroyed, to say nothing of the loss of life among the working classes."
Such were his methods!
Source: Storms and sunshine of a soldier's life : Colin Mackenzie.
You’ve heard of the story of Anarkali bricked up by Akbar. Avitabile also put a couple of people together in a small room & then gradually bricked the door up on them to extort tax from them. One of them had died in there, & the rest were released after agreeing to pay the tax.
Not that Avitabile needed any laws or rules to govern the city; he was the law and would dispense his form of justice without any regards for innocent & guilty. However, he formed an advisory council of Muslim Qazis and Sikh, Hindu Judges, and would hold Durbar almost every day.
And those minarets were none other than those of the grand mosque of Peshawar Masjid Mohabat Khan.
Masjid Mohabat Khan Peshawar
There are so many anecdotes and stories of his brutal means to establish order or dispense justice that it would need multiple threads to record all of them. It should suffice to mention that he would:There are so many anecdotes and stories of his brutal means to establish order or dispense justice that it would need multiple threads to record all of them. It should suffice to mention that he would
→ Throw people off Minarets. → Hang people to death either by neck or by heels. In the latter case, it would take about two hours for a man to die, and in the process, limbs would come off his body. → Chop off body parts. → Expose people to extreme heat naked or freeze people to death in winters by pouring cold on their naked bodies. → Brick up people in small rooms. →So much so, that he learnt about the punishment of hitting someone with slippers; not causing so much pain but derogatory enough to strip anyone of all the honor and self-esteem.
He once punished hundreds of Sikh soldiers with beating with slippers when they were repeatedly beaten and harassed by Afridis of Khyber and left behind their fellow soldiers & weapons in their flight out of the battles, that too after the operations of the army of the retributions in 1842.
Source: Journal of a March from Delhi to Peshâwur and from Thence to Câbul
This man was such of a strange character. When the reports of the fall of Elphinstone’s army would arrive at Peshawar, the Sikh soldiers at Peshawar also rose in rebellion. At one point, he distributed arms among prisoners to help him quell the mutiny. At another point, the Kashmir battalion of Sikhs left Peshawar on demands for multiple pay raise. These soldiers camped at Chamkani. Avitabile then informed the native Afghans ( Chamkanis, and Afridis), mostly his and enemy of the Sikhs, of the situation that they could plunder them and that he would pay Rs. 50-80 for every head of the Sikh soldier. Afridis did attack their camp, and there deaths and casualties on both sides, however, it led to the objectives of what Avitabile wanted to achieve. The Sikhs soldiers right away regretted their mutiny, unconditionally surrendered to Avitabile, refunded the excess pay that they had received, and marched back to the walled city. For the role played by the Afghans, Avitabile released all their prisoners, pardoned their crimes, and allowed them to keep their plunder.
I only found this one story where he dispensed justice without resorting to violent means or bloody punishments. He settled a dispute between two women of a family whom both had given birth to a child (a girl & a boy) on the same day but both claimed that the boy was their child.
Avitabile left no stone unturned in assisting and aiding the British throughout the course of the 1st Anglo-Afghan War – from the initial invasion in 1839 to the operations of Gen. Pollocks’ take over of Kabul in 1842, and the subsequent withdrawal from there. East India Company acknowledged his services, and would launder his wealth to London which he received when he retired to Italy in 1843.
It is recorded my many authors that he wanted to return to his homeland Naples in Italy to settle and spend his life lavishing on the £50,000/~ pounds that he had earned during his services for Ranjit Singh. He had asked multiple times to be relieved, which was finally allowed in 1843. He spent a few months claiming each and every anna (penny) that the Sikhs owed him.
It is interesting, and very consistent with his character, to note that he would get rid of all of his concubines, his wife and his daughter before departing for Europe. There are no traces as to what happened to them but it is believed that he divided them among his friends except for his daughter whom he married off to his cook, and left her behind.
He made a home for himself at Castelamare, and married his 19 years old niece. He had to abandon his home for a more secluded place in Agerola.
Source: European Adventurers Of Northern India 1785 To 1849 (1929)
The castle of Avitabile in Agerola.
However, his marital life was not at peace when he found out that his wife had relations with a village lawyer. In one another place, she is said to have an affair with a servant of Avitabile.
Trouble, such as was inevitable in such an ill-assorted union, was not long in coming, for before her marriage the girl had carried on an intrigue with a village lawyer, which continued. The facts were soon brought to Avitabile’s notice, and his threats of what would happen should he ever catch the two together must have precipitated the end, which came in March 1850.
So how did the man die whom had killed more innocents than guilty in hundreds if not in thousands? He was poisoned to death by his own relatives for the wealth and property that he had won himself with sword.
Source: European Adventurers Of Northern India 1785 To 1849 (1929)
There is a memorial bust of him in the Church of San Martino Bishop. On it is written his ranks in different placed that he served, and the honors and awards he received. Make note the Order of the Durrani Empire Afghanistan that he received.
A trail and the town square of San Lazzaro is named after him in Naples, Italy