![]() |
| A young Mahsud, Manzal, Waziristan, 1917 |
![]() |
| Pashtun prisoners of war from Waziristan, 1936 (c). |
![]() |
| Wazir tribesmen, Waziristan, 1936 (c) |
This blog by Barmazid features articles on the history of the Pashtun people as well as images of historical importance related to Pakhtunkhwa and its people
![]() |
| Pashtun and Hazara soldiers of the British-Indian Army, 1898. From left to right: Khattak (Jamedar), Ghilzai (Havaldar), Mahsud (Sepoy), Hazara (Sepoy) and Kakar (Sepoy). |
![]() |
| British convoy on march to Haider Kachi through the Shahur Tangi gorge, Waziristan,1919. Photo by Randolph Bezzant Holmes. Source |
Mahsud men. From "London Illustrated News", January 3, 1948.
Captions:
1- "A typical Mahsud : his tribe occupy the greater part of the Southern mountains of Waziristan".
2- "Member of the fiercest and most turbulent tribes of the North West Frontier : A Mahsud".
3- "A Mahsud of Waziristan: Frontier tribes have been in constant conflict with the British".
Malik Mehr Dil Khan Mal Khel Manzaey Mahsud of Karma had been a fearless raider of his time. In 1919 he raised a lashkar and fought against the British. Later, however, he turned pro-British. In 1925 a murderer was arrested from his house in Tank for which he and his son were arrested. However his significant influence within the tribe and loyalty to the British helped him avoid serious trouble. For his services to the British, he was awarded the title "Khan Sahib" in 1928. [1] [2]
In 1947 Nehru and Dr Khan Sahib met a Mahsud jirga in South Waziristan. Robin Hodson, who was the political agent of South Waziristan and witnessed Nehru's address to the Jirga there, wrote: "Instead of remaining seated, to my astonishment Nehru got up and started addressing the tribesmen as though he were at a political rally, waving his arms around and marching up and down. At Jirga it is custom to sit on the ground and the person addressing the meeting would be seated on chair". Robin Hodson is only partially correct here. In traditional Pashtun jirgas, the speaker stands while the others remain seated. The colonial practice of a British officer sitting on a chair in the jirga was more an imitation of the panchayat of India.
Nehru spoke to the Mahsuds in Urdu, which the Mahsuds probably did not understand well. However, they did understand the insult he directed at them when he said that those present were debauched by British bribery. It struck a nerve of Malik Mehr Dil, who told Nehru: ''Hindu, if the British pay us money, there is a good reason. Our private parts are of extraordinary size as you will find out to your cost before long" [3]. With that Mehr-Dil advanced towards Nehru with intention of giving him a backhanded slap, but the the Political agent intervened.
The son of Malik Mahr-Dil Mahsud, Mir Badshah, joined British-Indian Army and lost one of his eyes in the First World War [4]. The one-eyed Mir Badshah led a large lashkar of Mahsud tribesmen to fight the Indians in Kashmir in 1948. Alam Jan, a grandson of Mahr-Dil, joined Pakistan Army and rose to the rank of Lieutenant General. [5]
![]() | |
|
Notes and References 1- "Khan Sahib" was a title conferred by the British-Indian government on their subjects. It was a title one degree lower than Khan Bahadur, but higher than that of Khan. 2- "History of the Pathans" , By Haroon Rashid, Vol-V, p-66 3- The Pathan Unarmed: Opposition & Memory in the North West Frontier By Mukulika Banerjee, p-185 4- "History of the Pathans" , By Haroon Rashid, Vol-V, p-67 |
![]() |
| Local Pashtun tribesmen hurl stones at Pandit Nehru's convoy from embankment near Landi Kotal fort in the Khyber Pass. Photo published in Life Magazine, November 11, 1946. |
![]() |
| Screenshot from "A concise history of Afghanistan" by Wahid Hamid Alikuzai, p-291 |
Its a local myth that Ahmad Shah Abdali conducted census of Wazir and Mahsud tribes. They were not part of his empire so number of their fighting men did not need to be estimated. Syed Ghulam Muhammad surveyed Waziristan during the reign of Timur Shah Durrani and reported: "This great tribe is wholly independent , and they have neither tax nor tribute to pay , and own allegiance to no one " [1]. Moreover Mahsuds had not yet branched off from the parent tribe of Wazirs in 18th century and were referred to as Wazirs as late as 1897 [2]. So its odd that in 1760s Mahsuds would be recognized as a distinct tribe and were censused separately from Wazirs.
Akbar S. Ahmed writes, "Two population indexes, rather than actual figures, are part of Waziristan demographic mythology and are said to date back to Ahmed Shah Abdali, the founder of the Durrani dynasty in Kabul in the eighteenth century. It is not clear whether the numbers refer to the entire population, the males, or the warriors, but probably they include only the male fighting population. It is also not clear to what exact dates in history the numbers refer. The Wazirs suggest that they encompass a broad period in the late eighteenth century, whereas the Mahsuds say that their figures refer to the late nineteenth century. Both tribes have a tendency to quote these figures as current and contemporary." ["Religion and Politics in Muslim Society: Order and Conflict in Pakistan", Akbar S. Ahmed, pp.17-18]