Showing posts with label Kandahar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kandahar. Show all posts

Sunday, 24 July 2022

The ruins of the old Kandahar

Old Kandahar was destroyed by Nadir Shah Afshar in 1738 during his siege of Shah Hussain Hotak. Today, the ruins are referred to as Hussain Shahr, named after the aforementioned Hotak king.
The ruins of the old Kandahar citadel

The ruins of the old Kandahar citadel, 1880. Photo by Benjamin Simpson. Source

Ruins of the old Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1959

Ruins of the old Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1959. Local children walk along road in front of ruins. Photo by Josephine Powell. Source

Ruins of old Kandahar, Afghanistan, c.1879

Ruins of old Kandahar, Afghanistan, c.1879. Watercolour sketch by Lieutenant John Frederick Irwin.

Tuesday, 28 June 2022

A 19th century map of Kandahar city, made in 1880

 A 19th century map of Kandahar city, made in 1880 by James Wyld (a geographer).






Recommended Books

Afghan men and dome-covered shops at Char-su, Kandahar, 1880

Afghan men and dome-covered shops at Char-su, Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1880.

Photo by Benjamin Simpson.

Original caption: "Char Su, the point to which the roads from the principal gates converge – the scene of Capt.Willis' murder by a Ghazi."

22-year old British officer Herbert Valiant Willis of the Royal Artillery was attacked and killed by an Afghan Ghazi at Char Su on 15 January 1879.


Source

Source


Source


Source




Eidgah gate, Kandahar, 1880

Eidgah gate, Kandahar city, 1880.

Photo by Benjamin Simpson. Source

The walled city of Kandahar had six gates :

1- Bar-Durrani gate

2- Kabul gate

3- Shikarpur gate

4- Herat gate

5- Topkhana gate

6- Eidgah gate






Recommended Books


Sardar Ayub Khan's ambassadors, Kandahar, 1880 (c)

Ayub Khan's ambassadors, Kandahar, 1880.

Photograph by Benjamin Simpson.

Original caption: "Group, Ayoub's Ambassadors, Abdullah Khan sitting on the right, his son on the left, and Umrjan Sahib Zada in the center. The last named is said to have raised all the Ghazis against us at Maiwand."

This photograph depicts the Afghan delegation that represented Sardar Ayub Khan, the ruler of Herat, in discussions with the British at Kandahar. This was after Major-General Frederick Roberts' victory over Ayub Khan outside Kandahar on 1 September 1880 (this battle is not be confused with the earlier battle at Maiwand on 27 July 1880 in which Ayub Khan had scored victory). The negotiations failed on this occasion and British refused to deal with Ayub Khan (since he opposed the Treaty of Gandamak) and confirmed their support for Abdur Rahman who went on to ratify the Treaty of Gandamak. 

In the summer of 1881, Ghazi Ayub Khan resumed his attempt to gain control of Afghanistan. He invaded once again from Herat and defeated the troops of Abdur Rahman Khan, who was acting as an axillary to the British. He seized Kandahar but Abdur Rahman forces dislodged him and drove him all the way to Persia. He tried in 1887 to get back into Afghanistan, but the British stopped him once more. Ayub Khan surrendered and the British sent him into exile in India.


Source


Source


Source




Recommended Books



Monday, 20 June 2022

The mosque and tomb of Ghulam Hussain Hazratji Baba, Kandahar




The mosque and tomb of Ghulam Hussain Hazratji Baba (a 17th century saint), Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1880. Photo by Benjamin Simpson. 

The tombs are marked at either end with a tall marble stones and decorated with black and white pebbles.

Original caption : "Tombs of Hazratji and Shere Ali's father". Source

Sher Ali's father i.e. Dost Muhammad Khan is buried in Herat, not Kandahar.



Mosque of Ghulam Hazratji, 1840 (c), by James Rattray. Original caption: "Mosque of Goolaum Hoossein Huzrut-Jee, the Great Prophet of the Afghauns, and the Tombs of the Kings at Kandahar".  Plate 30 from Scenery, Inhabitants and Costumes of Afghanistan, engraved by R. Carrick. Source



 Tombs of Hazratgi & Shere Ali's father [Kandahar]. (bl.uk)




Friday, 10 June 2022

British cemetery in Kandahar, 1881

European cemetery; graves of British soldiers in Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1880
European cemetery; graves of British soldiers (who died fighting the Afghans) in Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1880 (c). Photo by Benjamin Simpson during British occupation of Kandahar (September 1880 – April 1881).

Only commissioned and non-commissioned officers of the British Army were buried in this cemetery; others were interred in mass graves. Kandaharis did not desecrate the graves after the British left in April 1881. Captain A.C. Yate, who visited Kandahar in 1887, reported that the British cemetery had been treated with every respect by the locals.

Graves of British invaders at Maiwand, Afghanistan, 1880
Graves of British invaders at Maiwand, Afghanistan, 1880. Illustration for The Illustrated London News, 30 October 1880.

The normal-sized grave with a cross belongs to Major G.P. Blackwood, while the larger one beside it is a mass grave containing 40 soldiers of lower rank. The correspondent of The Illustrated London News noted that Afghans did not desecrate graves of British invaders from the First Anglo-Afghan War (1842) and expressed hope that those from the Battle of Maiwand would likewise remain intact.

Monday, 6 June 2022

A Baluch beggar, Kandahar city, Afghanistan, 1880.

A Baluch beggar, Kandahar city, Afghanistan, 1880. Photo by Benjamin Simpson. Source


Original caption: "Beluchi beggar - 'Dato Obolum Belisario". The Latin quotation in the caption, “Dato Obolum Belisario,” refers to the legend of Belisarius, a Roman soldier reduced to begging for alms.

Durrani gate of Kandahar, 1880 (c)


Photo taken by Benjamin Simpson.

 
Camels coming out of Durrani gate of Kandahar city, Afghanistan, 1880 (c). There is a malang or faqir standing on right of photo. The three men in military uniforms are British soldiers (photo was taken during British occupation of Kandahar during Second Anglo-Afghan war). Photo by Benjamin Simpson. Source


Source

Source

Monday, 30 May 2022

Zenana or women's quarters of the palace of Amir Sher Ali Khan in Kandahar, 1881


Source


Zenana or women's quarters of the palace of Amir Sher Ali Khan in Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1881.


Photo taken by Benjamin Simpson during British occupation of Kandahar, which lasted from September 1880 to April 1881.

There are British men and local men in the courtyard of the zenana of Amir Sher Ali's palace because the photo was taken during British occupation of Kandahar in 1881. The palace was empty and there was no zenana there. This palace was for occasional visits of Amir Sher Ali to Kandahar (he lived in Kabul), and this quarter was for his harem who used to accompany him from Kabul. Amir Sher Ali was already dead when this photo was taken. He, along with his harem, moved out of Kabul to Mazar Sharif in 1878 and died there in 1879.


Source


Source


Tuesday, 15 March 2022

Ruins of old Kandahar

 

Ruins of the old Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1959. Local children walk along road in front of ruins. Photo by Josephine Powell. Source


Monday, 21 February 2022

Bagh-i-Sardeh, Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1908

Bagh-i-Sardeh, Kandahar, Afghanistan, 1908. Source


The Joi-e-Shah inside the Bagh-i-Sardeh


A bridge over Joi-e-Shah inside the Bagh-i-Sardeh

Joi-e-Shah, in a deep channel near the outlet from the Bagh-i-Sardeh.




The Joi-e-Shah is a Mughal-era irrigation channel north of Kandahar in the Arghandab valley.


Joi-e-Shah, near the Bagh-e-Sardah, north of Kandahar in the Arghandab valley. 




Wednesday, 8 December 2021

Hindu Shahi rulers of Gandhara and Kabul were Brahmans

The Arab geographer Al-Masudi (896-956) writes that from "Al-Qandahar" comes one of the five rivers which forms the Mihran (Indus river). The Al-Qandahar of Al-Masudi was most likely Gandhara region (Peshawar valley and surroundings), not the modern Kandahar (which is referred to as "Rukhaj" or "Rakhaj" الرخج by Masudi and other Arabs).

There is no mention of "Rajputs" or its Arabic version "Rajbuts" in the text of "Muruj al-Dhahab" of Al-Masudi. The text simply says that the country of Kandahar is also known as Rahbut (والقندهار يعرف ببلاد الرهبوط). The variant in some manuscripts is Rahyut (الرھیوط).




Masudi says that the surname of the rulers of Al-Kandahar was "Hahaj" (ححج). Alexander Cunningham speculates that Hahaj or Jahaj could be Janjuas of Potohar region. However there is no solid evidence in support of it.

The clear and correct information about the background of Hindu Shahis is provided by Al-Beruni (950-1050). The latter informs us that Hindu Shahi rulers were Brahmans. Rajatarangini, a much later source (written around 1200 AD), claims that Hindu Shahis were Kshatriyas.

Wednesday, 1 December 2021

Correcting Bharadwaj (aka True Indology) on the "temple gate" of Kandahar city

The famous Indian tweep Bharadwaj (aka True Indology) has shared a British map of Kandahar city dated to 1880, in which one of the four gates of the city is named "temple gate". He assumes that it is temple of Shiva and states that it is "a testament to the durability and continuity of Hindu civilization".  1

"How did the traces of temple continue to exist until 1880? It is possible that there was still some Hindu presence in Kandahar city which rebuilt the temple. But for the temple to exist in the same place or remain in public memory until 1880 is indeed amazing. This is the biggest testament to the durability and continuity of Hindu civilization that they were able to conserve the memory of a temple for almost a thousand years in a Sharia dominant place like Kandahar". 1



However, this is a hasty conclusion by True Indology. The word temple in that map is not reference to a Hindu mandir. Some British used to loosely use the term temple and also used it for mausoleums and mosques of Muslims. For example, artist James Rattray (1818-1854) refers to the mausoleum of Ahmad Shah Abdali as a temple. "Temple of 'Ahmed Shauh', King of Afghanistan". 2

The proper name of that gate of Kandahar city was "Idgah" gate. Idgah means the mosque or site where Eid prayers are offered. You can see a mosque marked in the map he has shared, in adjacence to the so called "temple gate".

The four principal gates of the Kandahar city in 1880 were 'Kabul', 'Shikarpur, 'Herat' and 'Idgah'. The two minor gates were 'Top Khana' and 'Bar-Durrani.





Photo of the Idgah gate of Kandahar, taken in 1880.

Friday, 19 November 2021

A portrait of Barakzai Durrani lady, 1840 (c)

 

Source


Kandahar lady of rank, 1840 (c)


The name of that lady of rank in the above painting was Begum Jan and she belonged to the Barakzai branch of Durrani Pashtuns. James Rattrey (the painter) writes: "In continuation of the description of the dress and peculiarities of the women of Afghaunistaun, I take advantage of the opportunity offered, to introduce the portrait of a Baurikzye lady, by name Begum Jan." 

Rattray does not tell us more about the subject of this portrait but adds that these ladies wore white shuttlecock Burqas when out of doors or taking horse exercise. 

"When out of doors, or taking horse exercise, these ladies don an immense white sheet, reaching from the top of the skull-cap to the feet; a long square veil, attached by a clasp of gold or jewels to the back of the head, conceals the face, across which is an opening of net-work, to admit light and air. This dress is called a “Boorkha.” It conceals the whole figure, all outline of which is so entirely lost, that a stranger, on first viewing a party of these shrouded beings flitting about him in the streets, might well be at a loss to guess to what class of creatures they belonged. In addition to the winding-sheet, they wear long loose white boots of calico, fastened by a silken garter (Dulakbund), above the knee, and turned back like a falling collar, in order to display the lining. The soles of these bag-like leggings are of shawl, and the garters, “in their glitt’ring tissues bear imblaz’d Holy memorials, acts of zeal and love Recorded eminent,” from the Koraun, with scrolls and birds; the loose boots and veils also are embroidered in white and coloured silks. They sit astride on horseback, generally behind their own husband, or one of their own sex―if alone, a man leads the horse."








Tuesday, 5 October 2021

The mausoleum of Ahmad Shah Durrani

Ahmed Shah Abdali's tomb Ahmed Shah Abdali's tomb, from Khirqa Sharif, Kandahar, 1880. Photo taken by Benjamin Simpson. Source
Tomb of Ahmad Shah Durrani Tomb of Ahmad Shah Durrani. From " The Illustrated London News", 4 September 1880. Source
Tomb of Ahmad Shah Abdali 1910 Tomb of Ahmad Shah Abdali. Illustration from book "Afghanistan" by Angus Hamilton, published in 1910. It is reproduction of an illustration published in London Illustrated News, published on 4 September 1880.
Painting by James Rattry Tomb of Ahmad Shah Durranim 1840 (c). Painting by James Rattry. Source
Kandahar street scene 1950s Kandahar, Afghanistan, circa 1950's, showing a street scene and the mauseoum of Ahmad Shah Durrani. Photo by Paul popper.
James Rattrey writes:

"The sovereign who sleeps there, called by the Afghauns “the faultless King,” was the greatest monarch their country ever produced. The people of every Eastern nation, whether friend or foe, speak still in terms of the greatest admiration of his military skill, his nobleness of heart, clemency, and decision of character. His virtues were as numberless as his victories. Among the latter was the conquest of Delhi. Ahmed Shauh, with his son Timoor, crossed the Jumna, and after a severe battle with the Mahrattas took that city in 1759. The latter having regained the capital, entrenched themselves at Pauneeput, and prepared to meet the Douraunee monarch, who, with an inferior force and a few guns, destroyed nearly their whole army, consisting of a hundred thousand men and two hundred pieces of cannon. Thus Hindoostaun was at the mercy of the Afghaun; but policy and forbearance forbad him to extend his victories further in so remote a region, while his enemies the Seiks, whose star was in the ascendant, lay between his own mountains and the scene of his mighty conquests, and insurrection at home was rife in his absence. So, making over posts of importance to chiefs of Hindoostaun who had fought under him, he returned in 1761 to Candahar, the seat of government. Afterwards he returned to the Punjaub, to punish the insolent and gradually-aspiring Seiks; and having signally defeated them, he again retired to his capital, where he died of cancer in the face in 1773. In addition to his science and military skill, he was fond of study, and patronised men of learning and piety. In his latter years he was anxious to obtain the character of a saint: in this his Majesty’s wishes have been fulfilled, for his temple is regarded as the very perfection of sanctity, and is resorted to as a place of retirement by nobles or chiefs, who, discontented or tired with the world, profess to meditate and pray there. It is also frequented as an asylum by murderers and malefactors of every degree, and neither justice, nor power, nor rank, nor even the hand of royalty itself, dares to molest or touch them there. I believe that no European has ever been permitted to cross the threshold of this holy edifice; and though I, among others, often essayed it, no sooner did we show our unbelieving heads at the outer court yard than it was the signal for the Moollahs and Hadjees (pilgrims), who abounded there, to drive us away with boots and cries of disgust. Ahmed Shauh was succeeded by his son Timoor (father of Shujau ool Moolk), who was born at Meshed, and made Caubul the capital of his dominions, where he died."