Majority of the Tanolis (or Tanaolis) insist on being of Pashtun origin but their rulers have accounted themselves to be of Barlas Mughal origin. Tanoli or Tanawali is actually an adjective denoting their abode Tanawal. They are divided into two divisions, Pul-Al and Hando-Al, the former occupies Lower Tunawal, and the latter occupy Upper Tunawal . In 1907 they numbered 58,700 [1]. Although not usually acknowledged as Pashtuns, the Tanolis had by long association become assimilated with the Pashtuns in manners, customs and character. The tribal and cultural practices of the Tanolis closely resembled those of Pashtuns and all of them appeared to have spoken Pashto in 18th century. Tanolis in Agror valley still speak Pashto language as their first language if not exclusively [2]. Captain E.G.Wase in 1868 reported that "majority of Tanolis have forgotten the Pashto tongue" but 'those of the Tanoli villages on the bank of Indus, all speak Pashtu'. [3]
Tanawal in 16th century
H.G.Raverty, on the authority of Akhund Darweza, says that Tanawal or Tunawal was overrun by Khashi tribes of Pashtuns under the leadership of Ali Asghar in the latter part of Akbar's reign, and its former inhabitants were expelled from some parts of Tunawal. [6]
Tanolis in 18th century
An Indian surveyor Syed Ghulam Muhammad visited Tanawal in 1780 and reported that Pashto language was spoken by its inhabitants and their chief Gul Sher Khan paid allegiance to Timur Shah Durrani. He writes: -
"Tunawal is the name of a small territory lying on the east bank of the Aba-Sin, about twenty kuroh in length, and about the same in breadth, through which the Siran river flows from north to south but inclining a little to the south-west. It is a very mountainous tract of country, and its inhabitants belong to different tribes, a number of whom are Afghans; and the Pushto language is spoken among them all. The chieftainship lies with the Tunawalis, who account themselves to be of Mughal descent; but, at present, they are scarcely distinguishable in their appearance from the Afghans and various other peoples of this part. Latterly, according to some accounts, they have laid claim to be descended from the tribe of Birlas –Amir Timur's own tribe."....
…"Half a kuroh further you reach Derah-i-Gul Sher Khan, a large town, the seat of the government, and place of residence of Gul Sher Khan, the chief of Tunawal. This chief entertains a force of about 10,000 or 12,000 horse and foot, and rules over this part. He pays allegiance to the Badshah of Kabul".
“The Tunawal's number about 20,000 families, and consist of two septs or divisions, named respectively Pul Al, and Hando or Ando Al, the words being written both ways. The former hold the parts east of the Siran, or south-east portion of Tunawal, and the latter those on the west or north-west part. The latter tracts belong to Pa'indah Khan, and were held by his ancestors before him. Their chief places and seat of authority are Bir, Puhar, and Dera'h." [4]
George Forester, an English traveler and a civil servant of East India Company, visited Tanawal in 1783 and mentions Gul Sher Khan (the chief of Tanolis) as " Mahometan of the Afghan tribe". [5]
In 1752 AD, Zabardast Khan Tanoli joined Ahmad Shah Durrani in his conquest of India. In 1761 AD he was granted the title of Suba Khan by Ahmad Shah Durrani for his bravery in the historic battle at Panipat. [7]
Tribally allied with the Pashtuns they participated in the wars against the Sikhs and the British, and in the Charles Allen's analysis of those wars the Tanolis are described as being "extremely hostile, brave and hardy and accounted for the best swordsmen in Hazarah" [8].
References:
1- Hazara Gazetteer 1907, p-29
2- "History of the Pathans", By Haroon Rashid, Vol-6, p-34
3- Report of the Land Revenue Settlement of the Hazara District of the Punjab, 1868-74 , p-74
4- "Notes on Afghanistan and Part of Baluchistan", Henry George Raverty, p-275
5- A journey from Bengal to England, vol-2 p-49.
6- "Notes on Afghanistan and Part of Baluchistan", Henry George Raverty, pp-275-276
7- "History of the Pathans", By Haroon Rashid, Vol-6, p-36
8- Ibid, p-34
9- A Tanoli Afghan, 1861
A group of Tanoli tribesmen guarding a remote outpost on Amb States western boundary with the territory of the Salar Gaduns/Jadoons, October 1904. Photo by Aurel Stein. Via Jahandad Khan. |
Nawab of Amb and followers, Kaim Gulli, 1888 (c). Photo by 'Bourne & Shepherd |
Nawab of Amb and followers, Kaim Gulli, 1888 (c). Photo by 'Bourne & Shepherd |
A Tanaolee, Hazara, 1868. From Kaye and Watson collection. |
View of Mahaban range from Hazara (Tanawal region), 1858. A village in the distance and what appears to be ruins of a fort along the right bank of river Indus. Watercolour by Sir James Abbott. |
as much i know, the indigenous inhabitants of hazara division which start from haripur to the north of balakot are speaking hindko language. some pashtuns are living in the mountains but they are mashwani of kandahar as they say. tanolis are living in the north of haripur towards abbotabad high way. they called themselves afghans but can't speak pashto.
ReplyDeleteYes.of course tanolis aren't spoke pushto language but they are pashtun and handko language is due to regional domaincy and culture alteration in this tribe.
DeleteThe lower Tanawal consists of parts of Haripur district and even extends to across the Indus into Swabi district. Tanolis of upper Tanawal (i.e. Mansehra district) do speak Pashto atleast as a second language. Some Tanolis living in and around Oggi speak Pashto as their first language.
DeleteTanoli is a janjua RAJPUT sub tribe, not pashtun afghan or Mughal....
ReplyDeleteSearch the history carefully....
shut up .have u been in our areas your rajpoots are tenents of our afghan tanolis.for your kind information...tanoli tanokhel is sub tribe of gilzais...
Deletedear baramazid..u have very little knowledge about tanolis...for genuine history you should have to contact with area peoples.,most of peoples living in tanawal area named them self tanolies. but they are not.some of casts such as abbasids and rajpoots made a man name as tanoli khan,all are fibricated. meths..but tanoli or tanokhel is subtribe of gilzais...the whole diaspora 100 except illegitimate using their name or coined on behalf of living in terriotry.a.another drawback is that initally there were no proper history of tanolies..the world consider amb state history as tanoli.dear amb nawabs were part of tanoli tribe ,they are not representing whole nation.one of them for the sake of their benefits and grandour made him self mugul, they are self centered they have killed their own peoples along with other patans brother for sooting and for theie boss english..but their old as well as new record consider them afghan.if u read any books written by our historian..they felt proud to b afghan.from child hood we are listining about our forefather land stories..how mighty were we afghans. we are afghan patans by blood by origan and proud of that ..still 40 perecent of us speak pushto as mother toung.
ReplyDeleteWhere I can find true history of tanoli,s
DeleteExcuse me bro... Being a historian of Pakistani tribes of pashtun, i wanna discuss with you in detail. Can you text me on my personal WhatsApp number . 03206528482 i will be thankful. I also believe that tanoli are Pathans.
Deleteyou can learn about us on watson and kayle.forign gernal of india.the martial races of india pk bonrgee.old records of british mesum....non but gilzai afghans
ReplyDeleteCan any body share the true history of tanoli,s with references
ReplyDeleteAoA . Sir I read with interest your account of Tanolis but I think here is a mistake in a date given.You cite a surveyor Syed Ghulam Muhammad and say that he visited Tanawal in 1780. Do you perhaps mean 1870? The citation that you give mentions the area under Painda Khan Tanoli (founder of the Amb family) but in 1780 Painda Khan wasnt even born . He was born in 1813 and died in 1844 . I hope you will kindly make the correction as this is a serious clash of historical dates. Thanks.
ReplyDelete